<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Treatise Concerning a Possible Relationship Between the First Epistle of St. Paul to the Thessalonians and the First Epistle of St. Paul to the Corinthians, As Investigated by a Humble Sinner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/</link>
	<description>...as in a mirror dimly</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:44:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/#comment-498</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-498</guid>
		<description>Peter: That&#039;s an interesting thought - I have been wondering about that previous letter, but hadn&#039;t considered a similar connection to 1 Thessalonians.

Roger: Ooh bold meme... I&#039;ll get onto it soon... if I dare!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter: That&#8217;s an interesting thought &#8211; I have been wondering about that previous letter, but hadn&#8217;t considered a similar connection to 1 Thessalonians.</p>
<p>Roger: Ooh bold meme&#8230; I&#8217;ll get onto it soon&#8230; if I dare!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Mugs</title>
		<link>http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Mugs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-497</guid>
		<description>matt, this is awesome... and exactly what i want to be reading on a 1 cor PhD dude&#039;s blog...

p.s. tag http://www.theologer.com/2008/10/big-sin-meme.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>matt, this is awesome&#8230; and exactly what i want to be reading on a 1 cor PhD dude&#8217;s blog&#8230;</p>
<p>p.s. tag <a href="http://www.theologer.com/2008/10/big-sin-meme.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.theologer.com/2008/10/big-sin-meme.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirk</title>
		<link>http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 10:13:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-496</guid>
		<description>It occurred to me that Paul&#039;s non-extant previous letter to the Corinthians (1 Corinthians 5:9) might have been more or less a copy of 1 Thessalonians, which he deliberately echoed when writing the extant letter. I&#039;m not sure how that fits in with dating ideas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It occurred to me that Paul&#8217;s non-extant previous letter to the Corinthians (1 Corinthians 5:9) might have been more or less a copy of 1 Thessalonians, which he deliberately echoed when writing the extant letter. I&#8217;m not sure how that fits in with dating ideas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 08:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-495</guid>
		<description>...Hmm... we could call that &quot;The Timothean Hypothesis&quot; and all of a sudden it sounds respectable!

Of course, one major difference between the two letters is the tone - in pretty much every issue, Paul is commending and encouraging/comforting the Thessalonians; but chiding and correcting the Corinthians.  So I wonder if 1 Thessalonians might be thought of as a letter to a church that was, in Paul&#039;s view, largely maintaining his gospel &amp; ethics; while 1 Corinthians might be thought of as a letter following a similar pattern but addressed to a church that was, in Paul&#039;s view, significantly departing from his gospel &amp; ethics.

For example:
- The Thessalonians recognise the Pauline gospel as God&#039;s word rather than human words; the Corinthians are more interested in human words.
- The Thessalonians are pursuing love of one another, and need to continue; the Corinthians are trying to compete with each other, and need to learn cruciform love (thus this section in 1 Cor is significantly longer - several chapters)
- The Thessalonians are grieved over those who have fallen asleep and need to be assured; the Corinthians are proud and disdainful, and need to be convinced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Hmm&#8230; we could call that &#8220;The Timothean Hypothesis&#8221; and all of a sudden it sounds respectable!</p>
<p>Of course, one major difference between the two letters is the tone &#8211; in pretty much every issue, Paul is commending and encouraging/comforting the Thessalonians; but chiding and correcting the Corinthians.  So I wonder if 1 Thessalonians might be thought of as a letter to a church that was, in Paul&#8217;s view, largely maintaining his gospel &amp; ethics; while 1 Corinthians might be thought of as a letter following a similar pattern but addressed to a church that was, in Paul&#8217;s view, significantly departing from his gospel &amp; ethics.</p>
<p>For example:<br />
- The Thessalonians recognise the Pauline gospel as God&#8217;s word rather than human words; the Corinthians are more interested in human words.<br />
- The Thessalonians are pursuing love of one another, and need to continue; the Corinthians are trying to compete with each other, and need to learn cruciform love (thus this section in 1 Cor is significantly longer &#8211; several chapters)<br />
- The Thessalonians are grieved over those who have fallen asleep and need to be assured; the Corinthians are proud and disdainful, and need to be convinced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-494</guid>
		<description>I think it means that these two letters were not written by Paul, but were written by Timothy!

Actually, I don&#039;t think that, but I found the post, and your subsequent comment, to be quite interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it means that these two letters were not written by Paul, but were written by Timothy!</p>
<p>Actually, I don&#8217;t think that, but I found the post, and your subsequent comment, to be quite interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/#comment-493</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-493</guid>
		<description>True... but I wonder if there&#039;s even more to it than that - a few things provoke me to wonder:
- there are terms and phrases that are strikingly similar, in similar contexts (and which don&#039;t appear elsewhere in Paul)
- No other NT letter follows this pattern of topics (apart from the &quot;ethical&quot; section)
- Certain themes are covered in both of these letters, but nowhere else in Paul (eg. the problem of those who have &#039;fallen asleep&#039; in relation to those who are still alive at the time of the eschaton)

So what am I saying?  That one is a copy of the other?  No; I&#039;m simply wondering whether Paul followed the usual convention of keeping professionally-made copies of his own dispatched letters; and - again, as was the practice of contemporary letter writers such as Seneca - made use of his prior material in subsequent letters.  1 Thessalonians was probably written from Corinth; and it&#039;s possible that Paul revisited this letter when engaging with the Corinthians via letter 5 years later.

Of course, this is by no means certain - but perhaps it&#039;s worth pondering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True&#8230; but I wonder if there&#8217;s even more to it than that &#8211; a few things provoke me to wonder:<br />
- there are terms and phrases that are strikingly similar, in similar contexts (and which don&#8217;t appear elsewhere in Paul)<br />
- No other NT letter follows this pattern of topics (apart from the &#8220;ethical&#8221; section)<br />
- Certain themes are covered in both of these letters, but nowhere else in Paul (eg. the problem of those who have &#8216;fallen asleep&#8217; in relation to those who are still alive at the time of the eschaton)</p>
<p>So what am I saying?  That one is a copy of the other?  No; I&#8217;m simply wondering whether Paul followed the usual convention of keeping professionally-made copies of his own dispatched letters; and &#8211; again, as was the practice of contemporary letter writers such as Seneca &#8211; made use of his prior material in subsequent letters.  1 Thessalonians was probably written from Corinth; and it&#8217;s possible that Paul revisited this letter when engaging with the Corinthians via letter 5 years later.</p>
<p>Of course, this is by no means certain &#8211; but perhaps it&#8217;s worth pondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kirk</title>
		<link>http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kirk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-492</guid>
		<description>Clearly the same person wrote both in similar contexts. Is that a revolutionary deduction? Umm - no! ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly the same person wrote both in similar contexts. Is that a revolutionary deduction? Umm &#8211; no! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-491</guid>
		<description>Ja.. ich auch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ja.. ich auch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/a-treatise-concerning-a-possible-relationship-between-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-thessalonians-and-the-first-epistle-of-st-paul-to-the-corinthians-as-investigated-by-a-humble-sinner/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 16:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cryptotheology.wordpress.com/?p=163#comment-490</guid>
		<description>ἀπεκδέχομαι τό λοιπόν.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ἀπεκδέχομαι τό λοιπόν.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
