I don’t like it when people find chiasms everywhere in Scripture – so often they just seem made up. But if this was an oral pattern known and used in epistolary communication, then I suppose we should be open to it. As I’ve looked through Titus, I’ve reluctantly come to view it in this way. Once again – as with 1 and 2 Timothy – it is Christ who is central, saving a people in order that they might produce good works…
Paul’s Directive to appoint Elders:
· Blameless, faithful, managing household
· Holding firmly to the message – able to teach & refute
Rebels: Meaningless talk, deception – especially the circumcision group
· Teaching for dishonest gain
· Liars, evil brutes, lazy gluttons
· Jewish myths & human commands
· Corrupted & disbelieving: Nothing is pure
· Unfit for any good
Titus: Teach sound doctrine, reverent good works:
· Older men: Temperate, worthy of respect
· Older women: Reverent, teaching younger women
· Younger women: Loving, pure, subject
· Younger men: Self-controlled
· Slaves: Subject, trustworthy
Grace of God has appeared, teaching us to say no to ungodliness while we await the appearing of Jesus our Saviour: He gave himself to redeem & purify a people eager for good works
Titus: Teach these things: Remind the people to be obedient
· Subject to authorities
· Ready to do good
· Peaceful & gentle toward others
We too: Were disobedient…
- Foolish, disobedient, passions
- Malice, envy, hatred
- But God saved us not because of righteous deeds, but because of his mercy
- He saved us through washing of rebirth & renewal by Holy Spirit through JC
- Those who have trusted God should devote themselves to doing good
- Thus avoid controversies about law/genealogies
Paul & Co-workers:
· Come to me; help Zenas & Apollos
· Our people must learn to devote themselves to doing what is good
RSS - Posts
Good stuff!
Yes, I’ve alway wondered about chiasms. Is there a good book out there that really gets it?
I’m not really sure about stuff specifically on chiasms – One book that I’ve read that looks into patterns of orality in the letters of Paul (including chiasms) is a book called… ummm… I forget, but it’s by a guy called Harvey. It’s probably called “Patterns of Orality in the Letters of Paul” or something like that. He does find a lot of chiasms, so I’m not convinced by all of it – but I did find it a useful way into thinking about the effect that the expectation of public reading might have had on letter-writers.
Yes, I’ve always wondered about the same.
Hey Matt
I liked it
it made sense
it pointed me to grace
it’s a funky chiasm
it pointed me to grace
it made sense
I liked it
the last comment was creatively indented at all the appropriate spots but your blog didn’t recognise it. I will now have to explain myself through interpretive dance.
I can imagine the indentations – and I like what I imagine!
…but I think I’m still going to have to take you up on that interpretive dance…
er, did I mention it would be a dance of the belly variety?
Your belly can do a chiasm, Steve? Jill must be thrilled to have married a man with such skill!
I have an “outie” not an “innie” that’s what makes it possible