Absolutely. He goes into the syntax of the antitheses and observes that they might be better described as triads of the structure:
1. Accepted piety/old righteousness
2. Vicious Cycle
3. Transforming Initiative
He sees this from 5:21-7:11. He deals rather admirably with the data that does not, upon first examination seem to fit the paradigm. My favorite part is that it makes sense of the, “do not cast pearls…” bit.
The title is, “The Fourteen Triads of the Sermon on the Mount.”
It’s on ebsco.